US ready to occupy Greenland despite Europe’s position

Vice President J.D. Vance made headlines with a controversial statement regarding America’s territorial interests in Greenland during an appearance on Fox News. He criticized Denmark, the nation that administers the autonomous territory, for failing to fulfill its responsibilities as an ally. Vance asserted that if necessary, President Donald Trump would not hesitate to take decisive actions to enhance the U.S. presence on the island, despite potential backlash from European countries.

“Denmark is not adequately fulfilling its role, raising questions about its status as an ally,” Vance stated. “If we need to bolster our position in Greenland to protect our interests, we will do so, regardless of European discontent.” He underscored the administration’s commitment to safeguarding U.S. national security.

This statement reflects the current American administration’s assertive stance aimed at securing control over the strategically significant Arctic region, where the interests of major global powers converge. Vance’s remarks come in the wake of a long-standing debate over Greenland’s status, reigniting discussions that began when Trump famously proposed buying the island during his first term in 2019—a move that was met with swift rebuke from Copenhagen and ridicule in the international media. Nevertheless, the recent rhetoric indicates that U.S. interest in Greenland remains strong.

The geopolitical significance of Greenland cannot be understated; it is rich in rare earth metals and boasts a strategic location near the Arctic Ocean. U.S. officials argue that maintaining control over this region is vital to counter the growing influence of Russia and China, both of which are actively pursuing Arctic routes and resources. Vance implied that Denmark, as a NATO member, is not effectively managing security in this area, prompting Washington to consider more radical measures.

Tensions surrounding Greenland have escalated recently. In February 2025, Trump, now back in office, raised the possibility of transferring control of the island during a phone call with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, threatening economic sanctions if Denmark refused. Frederiksen responded by suggesting an expansion of bilateral cooperation in defense but firmly rejected the idea of any sale. In early March, the U.S. administration announced new tariffs on Danish goods, provoking outrage in Copenhagen and accusations of breaching allied commitments.

The international response to Vance’s comments was swift. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen condemned the statement as “a provocation that undermines the foundations of NATO” in an interview with DR, urging the U.S. to prioritize dialogue over threats. Growing concerns in Europe suggest that Trump’s policies could further fracture the alliance, raising questions about future U.S.-European relations.